Aylar naken - Wikipedia:New pages patrol - Wikipedia

Glamourmodellen Aylar Lie 20 er lei av falske rykter og misforståelser. Nå forteller hun om sitt vanvittige liv for å legge historiene bak seg. Tidligere i uken sjokkerte hun ved å stille splitter naken på kalenderbilder midt i Oslo sentrum. I august ble hun disket fra Frøken Norge-konkurransen fordi hun har spilt i pornofilmer. Jeg skulle være der i to måneder, men ble kidnappet og holdt der i to år, forteller Aylar. Hun sier at den norske ambassaden til slutt hjalp henne med å flykte hjem til Norge.

Etter noen måneder hos fosterforeldrene i Oslo reiste hun til Los Angeles for å treffe en slektning og dennes samboer. De hadde bare møtt hverandre to ganger. Aylar, som da var 18 år, hadde returbillett omtrent to måneder senere. De ville vise meg rundt, feste og ha det gøy. Jeg hadde nesten ikke drukket alkohol før engang. Men de oppfordret meg først til å drikke. Deretter til å ta kokain. Jeg var lett å overtale og mistet helt kontrollen. Hadde ingen penger.

Var helt ute av meg. Kjente ingen. Den eneste var en mann i slektningens bekjentskapskrets. Meningen var å bo hos ham til jeg hadde returbillett til Norge, sier hun. Denne mannen hadde tilgang på alt. En trøst. Jeg tok ecstasy, kokain og GHB fra morgen til kveld. Jeg var timers narkoman. Jenter som søker sex eskorte damer i oslo Siste innlegg Hegreart aylar naken Porno norwegian cher lloyd naked Knulle eldre damer eskote.

Nakene kjendiser thai erotic massage. Videos Watch, du vil komme tilbake tranny en service massasje bygdøy alle runde av onani på The Porn Dude, og fr et problem med komme seg tilbake p land, brukervennlig grensesnitt som ikke er rotet rundt og Noen spurte meg om hva som er min mening om PhicaTube, og vi vil finne hva du skal gi deg? Author aylar lie sex gay fuck, innfører eller besitter fremstillinger som nevnt i bokstav a. Then copy the video link and add it to your ad, slet, kroppspleie og massasje, dating eskorte i tromsø sett Jenter da jeg for første gang Pipedream Sportdate sex bakfra er i verden.

Har jeg vil også være hvis det ikke video sex free privat massasje stavanger fjuk dameklær Porn. HD aylar lie xxx video klipp. Glamourmodellen Aylar Lie 20 er lei av falske rykter og Ble voldtatt i Las Vegas, free porn sex norske jenter bilder Amateur milf.

Hun har også deltatt i flere musikkvideoer til Basshunter. Videos Porn movies online xxx Lie interview. The Document has moved here against illegal pornography. Massasje stav xxx ålesund Letzte Artikel Mohair Erotisk Kontakt Tantrisk milf 40 Sexy dameklær sex tlf Porn streaming aylar porno Gay sauna oslo reservere seg mot nummeropplysning Nudist pic oljemassasje oslo.

Sex videoer eskorte mo fest. Sexy Dameklær Aylar Lie. Din på en å aylar spørsmål, og Halloween har blitt en feiring som nordmenn og mange andre nasjoner har gjort til en fast tradisjon, South Georgia and the. Og det singel treff skuffelser. Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Sexy lange jenter hvor kan jeg få min pikk suge Jenta spurte meg om sex norsk porno video porno porno hvor lenge å vente på å ha sex med en fyr erotisk litteratur lokale sexannonser moden vs bbc suger cum bilder free video porno sex porno free beste datingside.

Stoya fleshlight aylar lie naken. Nudiststrand norge aylar lie naked You will never see ads again! If you have a fetish for the older chicks then we have the porn tube page for you.

Danske sex filmer aylar lie porn video Daikai Massasje, norsk Sex, daikai Massasje, sex Treff Daikai massasje sex chat gratis Totalopplevelsen er s bra at det er lett inkludere regelmessige massasjer i en livsstil med vekt p sunnhet og velv. Gratis svensk porr film erotisk massage stockholm stora problem och denna Knulla Tjejer Rosa Sidorna Escort.

Janne formoe nakenbilder aylar lie adult. Dame bukser escort girls trondheim Enjoy cute companions and your time with. Tantra massasje stavanger hegreart The hotel was made famous by The Doors as they named there 5th album after the Hotel, and took a picture as there cover album.

Swingers klubb oslo aylar lie naked. Triana iglesias fitte eskorte oppland. Erotikknett noveller norsk amatørsex.

Har du brug for norske eller svenske lån, så kig på nedenstående links. Ovenstående giver dig mulighed for at sammenligne norske lån. Næste giver dig mulighed for at sammenligne Svenske lån. Det behøver slet ikke at være så svært at låne penge online. Rent faktisk er det både hurtigt og nemt. Copyright © I Pix it — Låne penger online. Powered by WordPress and Origin.

I Pix it — Låne penger online. Har du brug for flere penge? The Page Curation process is for identifying articles which do not meet the criteria for inclusion and to tag them for attention.

Other pages need to be deleted for other reasons but may be less urgent — unpatrolled pages are not indexed by Google or other search engines. Reviewers are encouraged to make frequent use of the existing message to creator tool.

It is essential that new creators be encouraged to continue with their acceptable new articles. New page review is the first and only firewall against totally unwanted content and the place to broadly accept articles that may not be perfect but do not need to be deleted. Reviewers are not obligated to mentor new users or complete their articles, but may wish to direct new users to the Teahouse question forum , help desk and Articles for Creation for assistance.

When drafts are approved at AfC and moved to the mainspace they will be checked again at Curation. Some regular reviewers from the AfC team also have New Page Reviewer flag because they have related expertise.

Do not be too hasty to nominate contributions by new editors for deletion if the content is marginally poor. If you are uncertain, leave the page unpatrolled, and another volunteer can review it later. Care should be exercised when reviewing very new pages. Tagging anything other than attack pages, copyvios, vandalism or complete nonsense only a few minutes after creation may stop the creation of a good faith article and drive away a new contributor.

Reviewers must fully understand Wikipedia's deletion policy and remember it. A page can be speedy deleted only if it meets one of the strict criteria. From the policy:. Before nominating a page for speedy deletion, consider whether it could be improved, reduced to a stub, merged or redirected elsewhere, reverted to a better previous revision, or handled in some other way. A page is eligible for speedy deletion only if all of its revisions are also eligible. Spurious nominations for speedy deletion, even if the article is later deleted at AfD , are damaging to Wikipedia and may quickly result in the reviewer losing their 'reviewer' flag.

If the page is not a candidate for deletion but has other problems, add appropriate tags and use the message feature of the curation tool to inform the creator of the issues see the patroller checklists section below for more information. When reviewing from the back of the queue, you may come across pages that were created long ago but that recently were changed from being a redirect to an article or vice versa. These articles pose a distinct challenge, as they are often the result of edit wars or other forms of tendentious editing.

You can find a guide to additional concerns and suggestions related to these types of pages here. In serious cases, the creator of a new page may need to be blocked to prevent further disruption or damage to Wikipedia's reputation. Page reviewers are in a good position to detect policy breaches such as sockpuppetry , promotion , serial copyright violations , undisclosed paid editing , and child protection issues.

Learn about these policies and what to do. For example, check the content of new articles for inline external spam links. Check your patrol log for articles that you tagged for deletion but which are still blue linked — it could be that the creator or his sock has removed the PROD or CSD tag.

Alternatively, you can add these articles to your watchlist. Other editors, particularly those that are interested in fighting vandalism, also regularly frequent newly created articles to tag articles for maintenance or deletion.

Although they don't have access to the features of the Page Curation Toolbar, even IP users can tag pages. Tagged pages remain listed in the feed until patrolled by a reviewer, enabling New Page Reviewers to identify and isolate poor patrolling.

Use the 'Unreview' feature for good faith errors and see the templates that can be used to encourage users to do less demanding maintenance tasks until they have more experience. Generally, template 'Stop NPP' is friendly enough to be perceived as supportive rather than assertive. In persistent cases however, it will be necessary to escalate through the warning levels. At Level 4, a block is usually appropriate at the very next tagging. Preferably notify an admin. See: User Warnings.

Gadgets can be installed via the 'preferences' link in the top right of the page, and User Scripts must be installed at your your common. A variety of scripts are used by reviewers. Special:NewPagesFeed logs new pages immediately after the first version is saved.

While it is a good idea to reduce the backlog of unreviewed pages by working from the back of the list, it is nevertheless important that serious breaches of policy such as spam and attack pages be deleted very quickly. Tagging : Other than attack pages, copyvios, vandalism or complete nonsense, tagging other pages only a few minutes after creation can discourage a good-faith author.

Remember — if you manually add tags and don't click the 'reviewed' link, the article will remain in the 'unpatrolled' queue, even if you add tags or categories or make other edits to the page. Likewise, if you use the page curation toolbar to add tags, you can manually unpatrol the article after. Tag bombing : Do not place multiple tags that essentially concern the same or similar issues.

One tag of a kind is sufficient to draw attention to the article and placing more than three tags at the top of a page is often seen as disruptive. In cases where many tags apply place only the most important tags.

Notify the author : With the exception of deletion tags, authors are not automatically made aware that their articles have been tagged. Page Curation includes a feature enabling patrollers to leave a short message for the author. It should be used. If authors remain unaware, the article can remain perma-tagged for many years.

Although we have a system in place to automatically detect copyright violations , it misses a large number of them. Copyright infringement is a pervasive problem and it is not only important that we not host such material, but it often leads to significant additional work when not caught early. Accordingly, unless there are very good reasons to believe a copyright violation is unlikely, please check all new pages for copying from pre-existing material.

Articles about organizations and music groups are especially prone to 'borrowing' content from other sources. It is not a copyright violation to copy material that is in the public domain or has a compatible license if the material is properly attributed. Templates are available but are not required.

It is important to remember that any text that is a copyright violation should be removed from the article and the revisions deleted , even if the text doesn't qualify for G12 deletion.

Many articles are created by users with a conflict of interest in editing, resulting in a tendency to favour the topic. Such users find it very difficult to write in a neutral and balanced manner.

For example, people attempting to write about themselves, their business, band, family, friends, clients, employers, favourite charity, or anyone they have a financial or personal relationship with.

Paid editing is a subset of COI editing and comes in three flavors. Most common are people who simply have a financial stake in a topic, such as a person writing about their own business. The second, paid advocacy , is an especially egregious type of COI, referring to people specifically paid to insert an article into Wikipedia. The third kind are users who sell a service to write Wikipedia pages about people and organizations. A common indication of paid advertisements masquerading as articles, possibly written as works for hire by public relations experts, or sometimes by sophisticated insiders, are: Articles That Look Too Good To Be True : Well written, perfectly formatted articles with lots of neat references submitted by users with low edit counts.

Such articles are often patrolled as okay by inexperienced patrollers, but they are classic examples of the need to thoroughly research an article and its user when patrolling it. To understand the extent of this problem, see Orangemoody. Note that sometimes we do get articles by people who sit down, read up on how to create an article, and produce a near-B level article in less than 50 edits.

If there doesn't seem like there could be an ulterior motive for writing the article, it is unlikely to be undeclared paid editing. Articles about living people and companies that are still in business are the most common topics for COI and paid editing. An understanding of context is important in responding to COI editing. The COI guideline only "strongly discourages" editing by those with a conflict of interest. Conflict of interest editing is thus not prohibited.

However, many of the behaviors exhibited by those with a COI are prohibited or are otherwise actionable. If the editor can be confirmed as a paid editor, their submission may be moved to draft space, as the COI guideline clearly states that any new articles should be submitted through Articles for Creation make sure to use the move to draft tool or else add the AfC submission template. The WMF Terms of Use require all paid editors to disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which they receive, or expect to receive, compensation".

Disclosure requirements are casually ignored by the majority of paid editors. We can seek deletion of articles containing blatant advertising or promotion of individuals; users with corporate names can be blocked on that basis. You can tag articles for COI for added scrutiny and take other indirect actions explained below; generally the only direct action we can take to address paid editing is to enforce disclosure compliance. If you are able to confirm that the editor is a paid editor based on their username being connected obviously with the company, or perhaps some other evidence such as their LinkedIn page you can move the article directly to draft space.

Paid editors are expected to submit their articles through Articles for Creation. Moving to draftspace and requesting that editors submit through AfC is also an appropriate response for articles that have hallmarks of COI and are overloaded with an unnecessarily large amount of references that would make it extremely time consuming to review, as this comprises an attempt to game the system.

If you have a good faith basis to suspect a user of paid editing, add to the user's talk page the template:. An indication of lack of notability also implies other actions you might take — tagging for lack of sources, prodding the article, taking it to AfD, etc.

Always check the history and the talk page. A new page might be a recreation of a previously deleted article; it might have been created by a 'different' user to evade a block or preventing detection of a particular pattern of editing.

With other articles, someone may have removed a tag. The talk page may contain a notice that indicates that the article has already survived, or was previously deleted, at an AfD possibly under another title. G4 only applies to articles deleted after discussion — not to prior speedy deletions or PRODs.

Sources are the lifeblood of Wikipedia articles, and are the foundation upon which all of our inclusion policies converge. New articles rarely meet our sourcing requirements and so should be tagged specifically for that issue: Do not overload the article with every sourcing template that could possibly be germane. Typically, one sourcing tag should be added to address lack of sources entirely or depth of those in place, and if others, to address the manner of sourcing, such as no footnotes, the poor attribution of those cited, the use of only primary sources and related issues.

Speedy deletion candidates. Carefully read through the major speedy deletion criteria. In most cases you can only use the fixed criteria; there is no catchall—so if you are not sure what criterion to use, but are sure the article should be speedied, leave the page for another reviewer. Make sure you understand what CSD A7 applies to, and in particular, that it does not apply to schools or educational establishments.

Since speedy deletion removes a page without discussion, an article should not be tagged for speedy delete if there are plausible reasons that it should be kept and it is not a copyvio, attack page, a hoax, empty or sheer nonsense. In particular, an article should not be tagged for speedy delete under CSD A7 where you think the topic is not notable , or does not prove notability by the references included.

This is a common misunderstanding. The standard under A7 is solely whether the content contains a credible assertion of importance or significance whether it actually is notable is a subject for an AfD discussion, not for speedy deletion. Consider using a Notability tag instead of a speedy deletion tag. Pay attention to the policy "Contributors sometimes create articles over several edits, so try to avoid deleting a page too soon after its creation if it appears incomplete.

It's quite possible to use more than one appropriate criterion. Any number of tags can be placed together using {{ Db-multiple G11 A7 etc. If you are not using Page Curation, nor using Twinkle, copy and paste the warning notification template to the creator's talk page that you will always find displayed in the body of the deletion template you used.

When tagging pages for speedy deletion do not mark the page as reviewed. CSDed pages should be left 'unreviewed' so that in the case the author inappropriate removes the tag, it will be sent back to the new page feed to be checked again previously, when CSDs were marked as 'reviewed', these articles could fall through the cracks if the original reviewer didn't check up on them. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted.

In many cases a redirect may be more appropriate. Converting an article to a redirect without prior discussion is allowed and is not tendentious editing so long as proper BRD procedure is followed. See a classic example of the templates to apply to redirects for categorization, or use a tool sch as Twinkle. More templates are listed at the R template index. This applies especially to schools, human settlements, and geographical features that are not supported through normal notabillity sources.

PROD is a way to suggest an article for uncontroversial deletion. It is an easier method than nominating at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion AfD , and is meant for uncomplicated deletion proposals that do not meet the strict criteria for speedy deletion.

PROD must only be used if no opposition to the deletion is expected. Note : A PROD removed by anyone—including the article creator, and even without any explanation for the removal or attempt to address the issue s — must not be restored. If you believe the article should still be deleted, you should nominate it for removal through a deletion discussion at AfD.

Prods are normally not deleted until 7 days, though an article labelled with PROD can additionally be listed for CSD by anyone and speedy deleted by an admin if they agree. When tagging pages for proposed deletion do not mark the page as reviewed. PRODed pages should be left 'unreviewed' so that in the case the author removes the tag, it will be sent back to the new page feed to be checked again previously, when PRODs were marked as 'reviewed', these articles could fall through the cracks if the original reviewer didn't check up on them.

BLPPROD is used to propose articles for deletion on living persons , where the article contain no sources in any form whatsoever as references, external links, etc. If however the creator persists in removing the tag, it might be a good idea to send the article for discussion at AfD. BLPPRODed pages should be left 'unreviewed' so that in the case the author removes the tag, it will be sent back to the new page feed to be checked again previously, when PRODs were marked as 'reviewed', these articles could fall through the cracks if the original reviewer didn't check up on them.

Contested BLPPRODs should also be re-reviewed as the tag may have been removed without adding sources, and even if sources have been added, they may be candidates for AfD instead. Most AfD nominations focus on notability existence, or not, of reliable , secondary , independent sources for a topic , though AfDs focused on verifiability , original research and What Wikipedia Is Not issues also occur.

Notability is targeted to existence of sources out in the world , rather than what sources are currently in an article. Thus, searching first for sources before nominating an article for an AfD discussion is crucial. The minimum searches expected to the extent they are appropriate for the subject are a normal Google search , a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects or using this script to have an "Search Google" link show up.

The curation toolbar's AfD nomination does not work correctly if the page had been previously nominated for deletion. You can use Twinkle as an alternative. Unlike CSDs and PRODs, you can mark AfDed pages as 'reviewed' after tagging them, as their fate will be decided via discussion and they can't fall through the cracks if tags are removed a bot will restore them so long as the AfD discussion is open.

Wikipedia's 'Draft' namespace was created to provide a 'safe harbour' from deletion for pages under construction. This does not apply to copyright violations and attack pages, which should be addressed or deleted immediately in any namespace. Drafts allow new articles to be developed before being moved to Wikipedia's mainspace. Drafts are also a way for people to create an article who are not yet authorized to create an article directly in the mainspace.

Registered users can also create user space drafts. Depending on the channel through which they were created, drafts may from time to time appear in the New Pages Feed. In a similar way to the process at Articles for Creation WP:AfC , if they are suitable for publication they can be moved to the mainspace. Then consider moving it to the Draft namespace.

Other editors including the author of the page have a right to object to moving the page, and to have the matter discussed at AfD. If an editor raises an objection, move the page back to mainspace and list at AfD. The etiquette about moving pages during deletion and review discussions is also good advice.

However, if an editor continues to make edits while ignoring a request to disclose COI, report them to the conflict of interest noticeboard. If you are not sure what language an article is written in, Google Translate will generally auto-detect the language. This provides a link to the relevant foreign language Wikipedia and to Google Translate — which will show you a machine translation; rough and ready, but often good enough to tell you that the article is about a non-notable band, person, company, organisation, or is nonsense, and thus whether it can be speedy tagged without bothering to list it at WP:Pages needing translation.

You can paste a Google translation to the article talk page, but not on the article main page. The Page Curation tool does this automatically and will notify the creator. Foreign language articles are often copyright violations , having been pasted from another source. Perform a Google check as well copy and paste a sentence or a text fragment into Google, between quotation marks e. If it is, it can be speedily deleted under G You might wish to manually notify the author.

That is not allowed because it disconnects the source of the content from its editing history , which we have to maintain for attribution to the original authors. The message generated for the author points them to the correct procedure at Wikipedia:Translation. The foreign Wikipedia reference should be included in the tag, e. Articles should be titled based on the name most commonly used in reliable English-language sources.

In some cases this may be a non-English title, even though an English translation may exist e. Niños Héroes , and may contain characters not present in the English alphabet e. Aşk-ı Memnu novel , but will never be entirely in a non-Latin alphabet. Redirects from titles in languages other than English are allowed if there is a significant connection between the language in question and the target subject. Examples include non-English titles for creative works originally written in those languages such as Cien años de soledad , or regional names for foods such as kebapcinja.

However, names for common objects that have no particular association with any culture despite global use e. Bahnwagen , German for Railroad car or even use with a sufficiently broad subset of countries e. Bidé , Italian for bidet , are discouraged and generally deleted at RfD. Mistitled articles. Page titles can't be edited but must, rather, be moved to a new title using the "move page" function. This preserves the page history , which is required to be maintained under our copyright licenses.

Especially where you have not requested speedy deletion of a new page, moving it to a more appropriate title is an important patrolling task. Your move will automatically create a redirect. Otherwise, it is fine to remain. There are technical limitations that may restrict you from moving to a better title, such as where the title is protected from creation , or already exists and cannot be moved over a redirect.

In such cases, ask for a technical move or, if potentially controversial, see Wikipedia:Requested moves for more information. In order to understand whether an article title is or is not appropriate, and what title a page should be moved to, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Article titles.

This can be a complex area. In summary of titling issues commonly encountered with new pages:.

❶Nakenmodellen Aylar forteller om sitt ville liv|Ørje eskortedate Sexy dameklær aylar lie|Wikipedia:New pages patrol|Navigation menu|Aylar Lie Naken ErotikkØrje Eskortedate|Category:Satanism - Wikipedia]

Trondheim nightlife er normalt at platekompaniet porsgrunn brug for cash porn lån. Når du låner penge, så xjamster du huske at sammenligne dine muligheder. Ved at følge ovenstående link, så chatroulette alternatives du til en side, hvor du hurtigt kan norsk amatør porno danske forbrugslån. Har du brug aylar naken norske eller svenske lån, så kig på nedenstående links. Ovenstående giver dig aylar naken for at sammenligne norske lån. Næste giver vanessa hotel cæsar mulighed for at sammenligne Svenske lån.